Streptococcus mitis infective endocarditis in a patient with ventricular septal defect and orthodontic appliances

  1. Dimitrios Amorgianos 1,
  2. Hui Min Chen 2 and
  3. Niki Walker 3
  1. 1 Cardiology Department, NHS Shetland, Lerwick, UK
  2. 2 South Tees Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Middlesbrough, UK
  3. 3 Scottish Adult Congenital Cardiac Service, Golden Jubilee National Hospital West of Scotland Regional Heart and Lung Centre, Glasgow, UK
  1. Correspondence to Dr Dimitrios Amorgianos; d.amorgianos@gmail.com

Publication history

Accepted:16 Feb 2022
First published:02 Mar 2022
Online issue publication:02 Mar 2022

Case reports

Case reports are not necessarily evidence-based in the same way that the other content on BMJ Best Practice is. They should not be relied on to guide clinical practice. Please check the date of publication.

Abstract

We describe a case of a girl in a remote and rural location in Scotland with a perimembranous ventricular septal defect and orthodontic appliances, who developed right-sided infective endocarditis from Streptococcus mitis due to abrasion of the oral mucosa from the arch wire following its adjustment in the dental clinic.

Fitting and adjustment of orthodontic appliances are not considered to be high-risk dental procedures and antibiotic prophylaxis is not recommended even for patients at highest risk for infective endocarditis.

Background

The potential of the normal oral flora to cause infective endocarditis in the setting of orthodontic appliances is not addressed in the current guidelines.

Streptococcus mitis belongs to the group of the oral streptococci (previously known as the Viridans group Streptococci). Oral streptococci are the dominant species comprising more than 50% of the oral microbiota in healthy individuals. They are commensals with generally low pathogenic potential, but they can invade the bloodstream and cause serious infections.1 Among the oral streptococci, S. mitis is a leading cause of infective endocarditis and bacteraemia.2

S. mitis is a pioneer coloniser of the neonatal human oropharynx and remains a significant commensal throughout life. The origin of S. mitis colonisation of the neonatal oropharynx is the primary caregiver of the neonate and the external environment. The successful colonisation of the oropharynx is facilitated by various factors. The most important of them is the ability of S. mitis to produce adhesins that promote attachment to host tissues and IgA1 proteases to overcome the local host defences. Moreover, S. mitis is remarkably tolerant to various human antimicrobial peptides and can also modulate the expression of the proinflammatory chemokine interleukin-8. The latter, along with other not well-investigated mechanisms, appears to dampen the inflammatory immune response. The pathogenesis of S. mitis infective endocarditis is probably promoted by the very same factors that make S. mitis a successful oral commensal. The ability of S. mitis to produce adhesins and bind directly to human platelets is key in the pathogenesis of infective endocarditis. S. mitis can also produce a toxin similar to the Streptococcus pneumoniae pneumolysin.2

Health Protection Agency in the UK reported increasing rates of bacteraemia caused by S. mitis exceeding that of group A or Group B streptococci. S. mitis bacteraemia increased from 1.9 cases per 100 000 in the period 2002–2004 to 2.4 cases per 100 000 in 2008. S. mitis strains isolated from bacteraemic patients were also routinely resistant to commonly used antibiotics. Patients tend to become infected with their own commensal strains and the mortality rate from S. mitis bacteraemia ranges from 6% to 30%.2

Infective endocarditis is a rare infection of the endocardium with a global incidence rate estimated between 1.5 cases and 11.6 cases per 100 000 individuals per year. The mortality rate remains high—up to 22% in hospital, and up to 40% on 5-year follow-up. The higher mortality rates were reported in developing countries. The overall mean proportion of Infective Endocarditis (IE) patients that underwent valve surgery was 0.324±0.188.3

Right-sided infective endocarditis accounts for 5%–10% of infective endocarditis cases. It is more frequent in intravenous drug users, but can also affect patients with pacemakers, Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator (ICD), central venous catheters or congenital heart disease. S. aureus is the predominant microorganism (60%–90% of cases) and the tricuspid valve is the most frequently affected right heart structure. The usual manifestations of right-sided IE are persistent fever, bacteraemia and multiple septic pulmonary emboli, which may manifest as chest pain, cough or haemoptysis. In-hospital mortality is approximately 7%.4

In a study from 2009, oral streptococci were the second the most common cause worldwide for infective endocarditis (17%) after the Staphylococcus group (42%), with higher incidence rate seen in South America (26%) and lowest incidence in North America (9%).5 In a more recent review from 2016 oral streptococci remained the second most commonly reported micro-organisms, but they were the leading cause for infective endocarditis in Asia and also in patients with congenital heart defects.6

Case presentation

A 17-year-old girl presented to the emergency department in a remote and rural hospital in March 2020, with recent onset of mild, left-sided, pleuritic chest pain. She reported 8 weeks’ history of malaise, lethargy, night sweats, increasing dyspnoea and lately—light-headedness on exertion. Her illness started in January 2020 with tiredness, chills, body aches and night sweats. The symptoms were attributed initially to a viral infection and the stress around her school exams. She felt better for a while in January 2020 and then her symptoms worsened again. She denied fever, cough or substantial weight loss.

She lives with her mother and sister and reported no COVID-19 contacts, animal exposure, or insect bites. There was no history of intravenous drug use, blood transfusions, high-risk sexual contacts or recent foreign travel.

She was fitted orthodontic appliances (self-ligating Damon Q brackets) in November 2017 and had regular follow-ups and adjustments in the Dental Clinic since. Two years later, in late November 2019, a routine adjustment of the appliances resulted in a protruding arch wire causing ongoing buccal abrasion and mild intermittent bleeding in the following days. She requested an urgent dental review, but there was no visiting dentist available. She was given an appointment several days later in December 2019 at which time the arch wire was trimmed and stopped further buccal abrasion.

Her medical history was notable for a restrictive perimembranous ventricular septal defect under follow-up in the cardiology clinic, lactose intolerance, acne and moderate thoracolumbar scoliosis with convex to the right.

Medication history included the use of contraceptive patch and adapalene cream for acne.

On presentation to the emergency department, her temperature was 37.5°C, the heart rate was 117 beats per minute, the blood pressure—122/74 mm Hg, the respiratory rate—16 /min and the oxygen saturation—100% in room air.

The physical examination revealed a slender, teenage girl of Caucasian origin, with pale complexion, without clubbing, cyanosis or peripheral stigmata of infective endocarditis. The cardiovascular examination revealed regular heart sounds with a harsh ejection systolic murmur loudest at the left sternal edge in keeping with the known ventricular septal defect. Neurological, pulmonary, gastrointestinal and skin examinations were normal, and there was no evidence of organomegaly, lymphadenopathy or rash. Musculoskeletal examination revealed the known scoliosis.

Investigations

The full blood count revealed anaemia (haemoglobin—82 g/L) and mild neutrophilia (white cell count—11.1×109/L, neutrophils—8220/mm3). There was significant rise in C reactive protein—129.6 mg/L (normal range: 0–8 mg/L) and erythrocyte sedimentation rate—130 mm/hour (normal range: 0–10 mm/hour).

There was also mild rise in prothrombin time—16.9 s (normal range: 9.8–13.5 s), international normalised ratio—1.5 (normal range: 0.8–1.2), D-dimer—394 ug/L (normal range: 0–230 ug/L) and lactate dehydrogenase—231 U/L (normal range: 100–200 U/L). Three blood cultures were sent in the following hours separated in time and site, but the first reports were available after 24 hours.

The ECG showed sinus tachycardia.

The chest X-ray was unremarkable, apart from the known scoliosis.

Differential diagnosis

During her assessment in the emergency department, a strong suspicion was raised for subacute infective endocarditis of the right heart, complicated with septic lung emboli causing the reported pleuritic chest pain, given the known ventricular septum defect and the traumatic adjustment of the orthodontic appliances in late November 2019.

However, due to the presentation with pleuritic chest pain and concomitant use of the contraceptive patches, the protracted constitutional symptoms in the previous several weeks, anaemia and the significantly raised Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR) we felt we should also exclude pulmonary thromboembolism and other underlying systemic illnesses, like malignancy.

A CT angiography of the pulmonary artery (CTPA) was requested and revealed small wedge-shaped areas in the lungs suspicious for mycotic emboli (figure 1).

Figure 1

CT angiography of the pulmonary artery (CTPA) revealing a septic lung embolus (white arrow).

The patient was admitted to the hospital for treatment with intravenous antibiotics for a working diagnosis of right-sided infective endocarditis, complicated with septic lung emboli.

The results of the blood cultures were available in the following 24 hours and all revealed bacteraemia from S. mitis sensitive to penicillin (Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (MIC): 0.094).

The following day, the transthoracic echocardiography confirmed the working diagnosis by revealing a vegetation on the septal leaflet of the tricuspid valve (figure 2) in relation to the ventricular septal defect. The peak velocity through the ventricular septal defect was 5 m/s. The heart chambers were non-dilated and there was trivial regurgitation of the aortic, mitral and tricuspid valves.

Figure 2

Two-dimensional transthoracic echocardiography (modified apical four chamber view) revealing vegetation (white arrow) on the septal leaflet of the tricuspid valve. LV, left ventricle; RA, right atrium; RV, right ventricle.

Treatment

We discussed the case with the cardiology and microbiology teams in our tertiary referral hospital, and we followed their guidelines advising a 4-week total treatment with high dose intravenous benzylpenicillin (2.4 g every 4 hours for 4 weeks) with synergistic intravenous regimen of gentamycin (60 mg two times per day for 2 weeks).

Patient’s temperature rose only once to 38°C in the first 24 hours after the start of the antibiotics, and she remained apyrexial thereafter. The neutrophil count normalised in 24 hours, the C reactive protein improved significantly by the fourth day (50.4 mg/L) and normalised by the 10th day (8.4 mg/L). The surveillance blood cultures at 72 hours after the onset of the antibiotics were sterile. She was monitored weekly with electrocardiograms and transthoracic echocardiography for local complications of infective endocarditis and the results were satisfactory.

Due to the COVID-19 pandemic with the resulting hospital pressures across Scotland, she was not transferred to the tertiary hospital for a transoesophageal echo. After 10 days on benzylpenicillin, she was switched to a single daily dose of intravenous ceftriaxone 2 g and discharged home to continue the intravenous treatment in the community, with plan for weekly follow-up in the out-patient cardiology clinic. Unfortunately, the pleuritic chest pain reoccurred soon, and during her first clinic follow-up on the 15th day, a repeat CTPA confirmed further mycotic embolisation to the lungs. She was readmitted to the hospital, switched back to intravenous benzylpenicillin, and transferred the following day to another tertiary cardiac centre in Scotland.

The transthoracic echocardiography in the tertiary hospital revealed a vegetation of approximately 1.1 cm attached to the superior rim of the ventricular septal defect (figure 3) and passing through the tricuspid valve (video 1).

Figure 3

Colour-flow transthoracic echocardiography (modified parasternal long axis view) revealing a vegetation attached to the superior rim of the ventricular septal defect. AV, aortic valve; IVs, interventricular septum; LV, left ventricle; LA, left atrium; L-R shunt, left-to-right shunt; RV, right ventricle; VSD, ventricular septal defect.

Video 1

Outcome and follow-up

Postoperatively, the patient had further 3 days treatment with intravenous benzylpenicillin, followed by oral erythromycin for a week. She made a smooth recovery and was discharged home 10 days later. A culture taken from the tricuspid area intraoperatively was sterile.

The septic lung emboli responded nicely to the extended treatment with antibiotics and required no additional management. The patient reported quick resolution of the pleurisy and dyspnoea and remained asymptomatic after the discontinuation of the antibiotics.

She continued shielding in the community due to the COVID-19 pandemic and she was followed up in the local outpatient cardiology clinic. After 8 weeks from the surgery, a routine blood test revealed mildly raised C reactive protein (26 mg/L) without any infective symptoms. Serial blood investigations revealed normalisation of the C reactive protein without the use of antibiotics and serial blood cultures were sterile.

At 3 months’ review, she remained well and symptom-free. The transthoracic echocardiography showed non-dilated heart chambers and trivial mitral, tricuspid and aortic regurgitations. The C reactive protein was normal. She was scheduled for a follow-up transthoracic echocardiography and clinic review after 1 year.

Discussion

The antibiotic prophylaxis for infective endocarditis is aiming at preventing the bacteria to infect the endocardium after episodes of transient bacteraemia during invasive procedures. Sporadic high-grade bacteraemias during invasive dental procedures were considered as the main risk factor for infective endocarditis of oral origin. This resulted in large numbers of patients with predisposing cardiac conditions receiving antibiotic prophylaxis prior to various procedures. However, the guidelines after 2002 tried to restrict this number of patients because of changes in pathophysiological conceptions and risk–benefit analyses. It is now believed that cumulative, low-grade bacteraemias, triggered by routine daily activities such as tooth brushing, flossing and chewing, are of greater significance, and specific attention has been drawn to the maintenance of good oral hygiene. Additionally, the evidence base for the efficacy of antibiotic prophylaxis in preventing infective endocarditis is weak.4

The current guidelines from the American Heart Association, the European Society of Cardiology and the Scottish Dental Clinical Effectiveness Programme recommend antibiotic prophylaxis against infective endocarditis only in high-risk patients undergoing invasive dental procedures.4 7 8 The definition of high-risk patients in the Scottish Dental Clinical Effectiveness Programme guidance included these with prosthetic valves, or prosthetic materials used for cardiac valve repair, previous episode of infective endocarditis, cyanotic congenital heart disease or cyanotic congenital heart disease repaired with a prosthetic material, whether placed surgically or by percutaneous techniques, up to 6 months after the procedure or lifelong if residual shunt or valvular regurgitation remains. These patients should be discussed with their cardiology consultant, cardiac surgeon or local cardiology centre to decide whether they would require antibiotic prophylaxis before the dental procedures. Patients who do not fall in the above-described high-risk groups, like our patient with the ventricular septal defect, should not receive routine antibiotic prophylaxis for infective endocarditis prior to invasive dental procedures.8

In contrast to the above, in 2008, the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence in UK had advised against antibiotic prophylaxis for infective endocarditis in people undergoing dental procedures. The advice was changed in 2016 to state that antibiotic prophylaxis should not be given routinely to people undergoing dental procedures. In the meantime, published reports suggested significant increase in the incidence of infective endocarditis in UK (approximately 35 additional cases of infective endocarditis presenting per month) and supported that antibiotic prophylaxis in high-risk patients was associated with lower healthcare costs, better health outcomes and a low incidence of adverse drug reactions.4 8 9

Our patient was never given antibiotic prophylaxis during the initial fitting of the orthodontic appliances in November 2017, or later during the periodic adjustment of the arch wire. Due to the less invasive nature of the orthodontic procedures, it is believed that the risk of bacteraemia is small and generally lower than the risk of bacteraemia reported after daily activities such as tooth brushing (25%), flossing (20%–58%), using wooden toothpicks (20%–40%) and chewing food (7%–51%),10 whereas the rates of reported bacteraemia after dental extractions could be as high as 100%.7 Several studies have reported low prevalence (1%–4%) of spontaneous bacteraemia of oral origin in patients with fixed appliances.11

Many authors after investigating the prevalence of bacteraemia during various orthodontic procedures have concluded that the adjustment of the arch wire did not seem to cause significant bacteraemia.10 However, in our case, the manipulation of the arch wire in November 2019 resulted in the end part of it protruding in the oral cavity and causing repeated abrasion of the oral mucosa and intermittent bleeding for the following several days. Unfortunately, there was no visiting orthodontist in the local dental service to readjust the arch wire soon after the oral mucosa injury became apparent, and the requested urgent appointment was given several days later. We believe that our patient developed recurrent episodes of bacteraemia from S. mitis from the repeated oral mucosa trauma and eventually—infective endocarditis, even though she was maintaining good oral hygiene prior to her illness. She brushed her teeth every morning and night and flossed twice weekly. She was also using a commercial solution of 0.2% chlorhexidine (Corsodyl) once a day, occasionally alternating it with a commercial mouthwash (Listerine) no more than twice weekly. Some authors have recommended daily use of chlorhexidine during orthodontic treatment in at-risk patients without good evidence to support this practice, though.10 There is some evidence that the routine use of a 0.2% chlorhexidine mouthwash before dental extractions can reduce the risk of postextraction bacteraemia, but this is not currently recommended.9 12 The routine use of 0.2% chlorhexidine mouthwash in our case did not prevent the development of bacteraemia from S. mitis and infective endocarditis from the repeated oral mucosa trauma.

There is no high-quality evidence on the relationship between orthodontic procedures and infective endocarditis owing to ethical considerations for conducting prospective clinical trials.10 A literature review revealed 13 reported cases of infective endocarditis related to orthodontic treatments.10 13 All cases were associated with minor orthodontic adjustments where antibiotic prophylaxis is not usually required. Some authors suggested that the adjustment of the appliances led to mucosal injury that might have contributed to infective endocarditis.10 No causal relationship has been proven during the review of three of these cases by other authors who suggested that the development of infective endocarditis was likely coincidental.10 14

Patient’s perspective

I have been asked to speak a little regarding my daughter’s case. I am her mother, and a senior staff nurse within ED in a remote town in Scotland.

When she was born, she had a hole in her heart. We were aware that this was unlikely to give her any significant problems until possibly her later life. Unfortunately, problems arrived sooner than expected, and with serious consequences.

After she was fitted for dental braces in 2017 there were no problems for a couple of years. The wire unfortunately cut into her mouth after the adjustment in the dental clinic in November 2019 and caused bleeding for several days until she was seen again from the dentist. The mouth trauma allowed the mouth bacteria to spread into her blood. The infection caused vegetation within her heart, with life-threatening and long-lasting consequences. With hindsight, had she been given antibiotics as a precautionary measure, it’s likely the infection would not have developed in the first place.

We hope that by sharing the details of our experience in some detail here, it might help to reduce the risks for other patients in a similar situation.

First, a little background.

My daughter had been followed by visiting Paediatric cardiologists from birth and last in 2017. The last outcome was that she should be treated like any other child, and her case scheduled for review after 3 years, I personally had hoped she could be checked each year, but of course accepted the specialist’s knowledge. (I had been labelled as an anxious mum due to my concerns and my medical background)

When she became unwell, we initially thought her symptoms were due to school-exam stress, combined with teenage hormones, and the common cold. This was until I noticed her bed-sweating, and then the penny dropped, she was getting more headaches, nausea, dizziness, and becoming increasingly breathless and unfit. Alarm bells were going off in my head, but it wasn’t until she actually collapsed in the shower the next day, that it transpired how seriously ill she was. Hindsight is a wonderful thing.

She was taken to the local hospital, where COVID-19 precautions made her treatment and care all the more challenging for staff. The fear was COVID-19 could lead to devastating complications. As a patient you find yourself isolated, needing people around you who love you, but knowing they cannot be with you in your time of need, while as a parent you feel helpless as you are completely cut-off finding yourself completely relying on the doctors and nurses who are looking after your child to do their best for your loved ones. Doctors and nurses wear masks, aprons, visors and it can be difficult to tell who is who, and time spent with patients are reduced to a minimum making it feel more frightening and impersonal.

Following few weeks of I.V. antibiotics in the hospital, my daughter was transferred to a tertiary hospital. After 6 weeks of I.V. antibiotics in total she had the heart surgery to clear the infection and correct the heart hole. This was a terrifying thought for me and my daughter, knowing she would have to go through the ordeal of open-heart surgery, alone, at the age of 17. She was incredibly resilient; we were all very frightened but also very proud of her.

It is clear that if antibiotics were prescribed as a precautionary measure when her braces caused trauma, it would likely have prevented the risk of infection, and saved her from having to go through this long and traumatic experience. Despite the good outcome from the surgery, we are still anxious for the future because we know that she has three heart valves with small leaks. The doctors said it was not a big problem, but they would follow her up annually. The infection she had in her heart, and the surgery which followed, were life-threatening, traumatising and life changing.

She is making a fine recovery, studying at home through the Open University. We as a family are hugely grateful to the doctors for their fantastic care in looking after her, in such a remote setting with all the challenges that brings. Also to the cardiology team in our referral hospital, who recognised it was too unsafe for my daughter to be transferred there, as so many COVID-19 patients were being admitted to their ward at that time. To the doctors at the other tertiary hospital where my daughter was eventually transferred, for taking wonderful care of her, treating her as their own for over 6 weeks - we are forever in your debt. And to all the nurses who gave that little bit extra of themselves. It really all helped to get her through and make a speedy recovery. The local hospital anaesthetic team, surgeons, and advanced nurse practitioners for taking time to get those difficult and important IV access, as the antibiotics couldn’t be given otherwise. You are all working very hard in difficult times.

My learning from this is to remember my family. It’s not all about work. To appreciate what everyone within the hospitals does. To never hastily assume things about patients or their relatives, but be objective in our practice, and err on the side of caution. Each patient is unique and deserving.

Thank you for taking the time to read about my daughter’s experience. Senior Staff Nurse and mother of two.

Learning points

  • We believe that repeated oral mucosa trauma from orthodontic appliances is a high-risk condition for developing infective endocarditis, especially for patients with congenital heart disease, despite the maintenance of good oral hygiene.

  • In our case, the good oral hygiene and the routine use of antiseptic mouthwash did not prevent the development of bacteraemia and infective endocarditis in the setting of repeated oral mucosa trauma from the orthodontic appliances.

  • Future guidelines for the prevention of infective endocarditis should consider the cases where repeated oral mucosa trauma from orthodontic appliances occurs in settings where for various socioeconomic issues access to dental services is not readily available. These patients should be advised to seek urgent review for adjustment of the orthodontic appliances and considered for antibiotic prophylaxis in the meantime.

Ethics statements

Patient consent for publication

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank their colleagues in the cardiac physiology and radiology departments in both hospitals for their help in acquiring the medical images submitted within this case report.

Footnotes

  • Contributors DA and HMC were the treating doctors in the rural hospital. They wrote the case report and contributed figures 1 and 2. NW was the treating doctor in the tertiary hospital. She reviewed the case report and contributed figure 3 and video 1.

  • Funding The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.

  • Case reports provide a valuable learning resource for the scientific community and can indicate areas of interest for future research. They should not be used in isolation to guide treatment choices or public health policy.

  • Competing interests None declared.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

References

Use of this content is subject to our disclaimer